I was doing some thinking yesterday about which is a more effective way of bringing about change. Is it from within “the system” or from without? The argument for affecting change from within a given system, is that you have access to “the strings” or “the gears” that make that system move. In this way you are able to make changes more easily because you can fix what is broken while leaving functioning portions working. The argument against this usually charges this idea as being too weak, and not radical enough. Better to have total revolution and start from scratch.
I have always felt an internal struggle myself with where I stand regarding this. I have a desire to be a radical or revolutionary. But when it comes time to do this, the people-pleasing side of me holds back, at least somewhat. Sometimes I have “big ideas” but when someone (who I gauge as not on board, or not able to understand my sheer brilliance) asks about this, I may water it down or scale back, for fear of a blank stare, or an “Ohhh…That’s…..interesting (cuckoo!).”
So I was thinking, I often end up feeling somewhat moderate I guess. Big idea fuel in a Ford Escort. I say to myself, “This is because you are afraid to be really revolutionary!” and while there may be some truth to this. I do believe there is value to this position, so long as you stay true to your ideals. Really, I think that the trick is not to be afraid to be within the system and use something that works and toss away what doesn’t. Be experimental, but don’t reinvent the wheel every time you need to put something in motion. A wheel is a wheel, its round for a reason. Just don’t let it continually take you to the same old places all the time.
So with a local coffee shop closing, the now familiar conversation comes up again. “Did you hear about Koffeeheads? Yeah, its a shame, it was a cool place. Great coffee. I just found it easier to go to one of the 5 Starbucks on the way to work.” There are those who talk about Evil Evil McStarbucks and their corporate coffee. But I think all in all, they do a pretty good job of providing something necessary. Something that was missing from many companies in America. They provide well for their employees and offer good opportunities for advancement. They try to be environmentally and socially conscious, etc. I am sure that they aren’t perfect. No one is. But I am sure as most companies go, they are not the worst of the bunch.
So is it better to be a revolutionary a la Che Guevara, or to be like Starbucks serving up Chai Tea and providing opportunities for improvement to those around you in some way? Maybe this is my 30 year old Dad of 3 stance, but I think if we truly pray for the wisdom to discern when to revolutionize and when to revitalize, we may find revitalization the more valuable option more often than not. Not all the time, mind you, but maybe more than we would imagine.
I love the new AT&T (formerly Cingular, formerly AT&T, formerly Cingular…) commercial that features a dialogue between a mother and daughter that I am sure is pretty commonplace in many households. Thankfully, my kids aren’t old enough to have their own phones yet so that is speculation on my part. It is the age-old struggle of responsibility vs. privilege set in a contemorary context with even more contemporary language.
Check it out if you haven’t seen it yet.
I am always interested in how technology is changing our culture and this commercial hilariously demonstrates how this happens all the time. It also made me consider how I talk to God. Often times it is relegated to short bursts of repetitive cliches. I sort of send out quick spiritual text messages to him that are often so similar to previous contacts that I might as well use shorthand. I suppose the Holy Spirit will translate this for me if God is not hip to the lingo. Thankfully we do have unlimited calling on that plan, although do I really use it that much?
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t have a problem with the concept of “breath prayers.” I think that is very healthy to turn to God to trust him, to release, to quiet ourselves without having to go through some long formal process. What I want to challenge in myself is rushing my communication with God. Often times, I struggle with the idea that God already knows what is on my heart, do I really have to say all the words. I think the answer is yes and no. I don’t have to say them for God to know and understand and maybe even respond to me. He is full of Grace like that! However, I know that the more time I spend in conversation and meditation with Him, the more he reveals to me and the deeper our relationship grows.
So anyway, I will still probably “text” God, but I want to make sure that I have a much more balanced communication with him the same as I would with any friend. Hopefully more so.
As many of you know, I get to lead a small group in my home each week. We’re a group of people who aren’t afraid to ask hard questions about our faith, about our God, and about ourselves. The group gives us all so much life–it’s actually quite amazing.
Last night, we were talking about how many “Christian” messages we all hear. These messages are basically claiming that, if the hearer follows the formula or the principles, then their live will be okay. So one Christian leader can say that PRAYER is the key to the Christian life. Another Christian leader from the same city can say that SERVING THE POOR is the key to the Christian life. A DISCIPLINED LIFE is the key. FOLLOWING THE SPIRIT’S LEADING is the key. BATHING is the key. You get the idea.
In our small group, there is a lot of frustration because we don’t know who’s right, and (more importantly) who’s not. Here’s how we decided to frame the question…
We decided to look at the life of the leader/speaker, and ask a simple question: Are they exhibiting more of the fruit of the Spirit than they did three years ago? Is this pastor, this speaker, this worship leader more loving, more joyful, more full of peace than they were three years ago? It stands to reason that, if they’ve really found the key to living the Christian life, then they would look more like Jesus–and that look would be found in the fruit. If that teacher is more controlling, more angry, more fearful, or more insecure…well, then we’d have to lovingly question whether or not his or her message is actually THE message.
We all agreed that we just need to look at Jesus. We also agreed that we’re sick of the formulas represented by an impotent principle-centered Christian faith. We simply want Jesus.
I am challenged by this. I am challenged to ask 2-3 people who know me best whether or not I’ve become a more loving, joyful, self-controlled person in the last couple of years. I wish more Christian leaders would do that. I think they (and I) would wake up from the long slumber of “church” isolation, and see life as it really is.
Please weigh in…
Recent Comments